Summary (Oct 02, 2003): Renowned neurologist Oliver Sacks is the author of many books, including "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat" and "Uncle Tungsten". In this first of a two-part essay on astrobiology, Dr. Sacks discusses his early fascination with the possibility of life on other worlds and the beginnings of life on Earth.
Display Options:  
Anybody Out There? Part I by Oliver Sacks, MD
 | The eighth chapter of H. G. Wells's 1901 fable, The First Men in the Moon serves as an introduction to astrobiology.
Image Credit: Airmont Publishing Company, Inc |
One of the first books I read as a boy was H. G. Wells's 1901 fable, The First Men in the Moon. The men land in an apparently barren and lifeless crater, just before the lunar dawn; then, as the sun rises, they realize there is an atmosphere; they spot small pools and eddies of water, and then little round objects scattered on the ground. One of these, as it is warmed by the sun, bursts and reveals a sliver of green. ("'A seed,' says Cavor . . . and then, very softly, 'Life!'") They light a piece of paper and throw it onto the surface of the moon - it glows and sends up a thread of smoke, indicating that the atmosphere, though thin, is rich in oxygen, and will support life as they know it.
This, then, was how Wells conceived the prerequisites of life: water, oxygen, and a source of energy (sunlight). "A Lunar Morning," the eighth chapter in his book, was my first introduction to astrobiology.
If Wells envisaged the beginning of life in The First Men on the Moon, he envisaged its ending in The War of the Worlds, where the Martians, confronting increasing desiccation and loss of atmosphere on their own planet, make a desperate bid to take over the Earth (only to perish from infection by terrestrial bacteria). Wells, who had trained as a biologist, was very aware of both the toughness and the vulnerability of life, and all the vicissitudes, which could befall it.
It was apparent, even in Wells's day, that most of the other planets in our solar system were not possible homes for life. But Mars was a solid planet of reasonable size, in stable orbit, at a reasonable distance from the sun, and with a temperature range, it was thought, which would allow liquid water to exist; so, it seemed, a fair bet for life.
But free oxygen gas - how would this survive in a planet's atmosphere without being mopped up by ferrous iron and other oxygen-hungry chemicals on the surface . . . unless it were pumped out in huge quantities, continually, enough to oxidize all the surface minerals, and then to keep the atmosphere charged? The obvious raw materials for oxygen production are water and carbon dioxide, but the photochemical decomposition of water (to yield oxygen) requires not only energy but metal-containing catalysts or enzymes, such as only occur in living matter. Thus the presence of free oxygen in a planet's atmosphere would be an infallible marker of life.
 | The early Earth had very little free oxygen until cyanobacteria (shown above) and other photosynthetic life forms began producing it about 2 billion years ago.
Image Credit: Y. Tsukii, Oct., 2000 |
It was the blue-green algae, the cyanobacteria, which over a vast period infused the earth's atmosphere with oxygen, a process that took between a billion and two billion years. The fossil record shows that blue-green algae go back three and a half billion years, but, amazingly, some still thrive today, in odd corners of the world, forming strange, cushionlike colonies called stromatolites. It is an extraordinary experience to go to Shark Bay in Australia, where stromatolites flourish in the hypersaline waters, to watch them slowly bubbling oxygen, and to reflect that this, three billion years ago, was how the earth was transformed. (Oxygen, of course, is a mere by-product, a waste product, so far as the blue-green algae are concerned. The virtue of photosynthesis for them is that it enables them to use the sun's energy to bond carbon and hydrogen and oxygen together to form complex molecules sugars, carbohydrates which can then be stored and tapped for their energy as needed.)
But astrobiologists should not see atmospheric oxygen as a necessity for life. Planets, after all, start without free oxygen, and may remain without it for all of their lives. But this does not negate the possibility of life. Anaerobic bacteria swarmed before oxygen was available, perfectly at home in the reducing atmosphere of the early Earth, converting nitrogen to ammonia, sulphur to hydrogen sulphide, carbon dioxide to formaldehyde, etc. (From formaldehyde and ammonia, they could make every organic compound they needed.) There may be planets in our solar system (and elsewhere) that lack an atmosphere of oxygen but are nonetheless teeming with anaerobes. And such anaerobes need not be on the surface of the planet; they could occur well below the surface, in boiling vents and sulphurous hot pots (as they still occur on the Earth today), to say nothing of subterranean oceans and lakes. (There is such a subsurface ocean on Europa, locked beneath a kilometres-thick shell of ice, and its exploration is one of the astrobiological priorities of this century. One would like to think of it teeming with great squids and whales - or the equivalent of these in an alien evolution - but it would be exciting enough even it if just contained bacteria. Curiously, Wells, in The First Men on the Moon, imagines life originating in a central sea in the middle of the moon, and then spreading outwards to its inhospitable periphery.)
The harsh emphasis, the pitiless black and white of scenery had altogether disappeared. ....We were no longer in a void. .. That caught one's thoughts sharply. Sticks! On a lifeless world?
"It may be a dead world now - but once -" ... "Life!" And immediately it poured upon us that our vast journey had not been made in vain, that we had come to no arid waste of minerals, but to a world that lived and moved! We watched intensely. I remember I kept rubbing the glass before me with my sleeve, jealous of the faintest suspicion of mist.
...it must flower and fruit and seed again and die. It was like a miracle, that growth. So, one must imagine, the trees and plants arose at the Creation and covered the desolation of the new-made earth.
Imagine it.
H.G. Wells, A Lunar Morning
|
It is not clear whether life has to "advance," whether evolution has to take place, if there is a satisfactory status quo - brachiopods, lampshells, for example, have remained virtually unchanged since they first appeared in the Cambrian. But there does seem to be a drive to gain ground, to become more widespread, more efficient, if this is possible. Thus the primitive anaerobes that represent the first signs of life we can find on the earth consisted of very small and simple cells, cytoplasm bounded by a cell wall, but without any internal structure at all. Such prokaryotes, as they are called, survive to the present day, along with the more complex organisms that arose from them.
(Primitive as they are, these prokaryotes are still highly sophisticated, with formidable genetic and metabolic machinery. They contain around 3000 proteins, and their DNA upwards of a million base pairs. It is certain that still more primitive life forms must have preceded them perhaps, as Freeman Dyson has suggested, organisms capable of metabolizing, growing, and dividing, but lacking any genetic mechanism for precise replication. But we have, as yet, no evidence concerning such precursors, nor of the abiotic chemical cycles that must have come still earlier, in the primordial sea.)
But by degrees this happened with glacial slowness - prokaryotes became more complex, acquired internal structure, nuclei, mitochondria, etc. (such nucleated cells are called eukaryotes) and acquired the capacity to utilize what was originally a noxious poison: oxygen. (Lynn Margulis, in the 1970s, championed the astounding suggestion that eukaryotes arose by incorporating other bacteria, which eventually became symbiotic - functioning parts, organelles, of their hosts. This certainly seems to be true of mitochondria, etc., which are genetically different from the rest of the cell.)
These evolutionary changes - from prokaryote to eukaryote, from anaerobic to aerobic - occupied the better part of two billion years. And there than had to pass another 1200 or 1300 million years before life rose above the microscopic, and the first "higher," multicellular organisms appeared.
(c) 2002 Oliver Sacks Reprinted by permission of the NASA Arts Program
Related Web Pages The Great Debate: Is Complex Life Common in the Universe?
Homing Signals
Cosmic Imperative for Life: Ann Druyan Interview
Search for Life in the Universe: Neil deGrasse Tyson Interview
Rare Earth? Are we so special?
For All Mankind: A Tribute
Note: Extrasolar Life: [2002-04-26]
Display Options:
|